Tue, Oct 31, 2017
|
With: | Robert Wu |
While we were dining at the Mountain Room at Yosemite Lodge the night before, Robert and I were discussing options for the day's outing. KP Pinnacle and the Ledge route on Leaning Tower were the two front-running options, but in the end we settled on Lower Cathedral Spire. I had failed miserably on Higher Cathedral Spire the previous day and was a little concerned that I might struggle on its lower cousin as well. The climbing in general is much easier, however, save for a single 5.9 move that can be aided and I had a grand time on this Yosemite Valley classic. Props to Robert for carrying most of the gear and leading all the pitches. This was definitely one of my highlights for the year.
LCS's Regular Route starts on the same side as that for Church Tower which we'd
just done, in the gully southeast of the buttress on which the formations lie.
You'd think this would have made it a snap for us to find our way to the start
as we left the TH by leadlamp, but alas, it did not. When it was finally light
enough for us to make out the towering cliffs and formations above us, we were
confused when things did not appear as we expected. It soon dawned on us that
we'd followed the climbers' trail up the gully on the northwest side of
the buttress, the route used for HCS. This would cost us about 45min's time in
descending back down the gully, around the toe of Church Tower and then back
up the southeast gully. Even though we had started out shortly after 6a, it was
almost 8a by the time we'd found our way to the base of the notch
between the two spires and the start of the route, a short distance to the
right (east), marked by a duck. We
set up shop here, changing into
climbing shoes, harnesses and helmets before Robert was ready to start up 15min
later.
The first pitch, 5.6, goes up a couple of large steps in a corner
heading east,
supposedly to a large, ant-infested tree. Robert looked around but found no
large tree, nor any sign of ants - a good thing, really. This caused some minor
confusion, but in hindsight I think it was because we did the lower part of
the route to Main Ledge in three pitches instead of the usual two. We probably
went right by said tree without recognizing it. The second pitch went up and
slightly left (is that the large tree
in the background?), with the
third pitch
continuing up to the left side of Main Ledge where the
Regular Route and South by Southwest split. We found a decent
bivy spot
on Main Ledge just above the top of the third pitch, pausing here to
take a break, snack, watch the
chipmunks run around and take
in the
impressive views. Afterwards we walked
along the ledge
to the right, finding it not exactly ledge-like, but soon scrambling to
the end where a 50-foot drop marks the start of the next rope pitch and the
crux of the climb.
A sling hangs from a bolt just within reach from the ledge's end, the obvious
A0 help needed if one can't free this move. Robert clipped a biner and the rope
into the hanger before attempting the delicate move. It looked to me
like an utterly
impossible move, hanging on vertical rock without a
decent hold to be
found. Robert believed otherwise, at least at first, figuring a 5.9 rating
meant he should be able to find the key to making the moves across the airy
space. He spent 5-10min in the effort, never getting his second foot off the
ledge, backing off several times as I sweated from my belay seat, expecting to
take the full weight of the fall I imagined was just seconds away. I held the
rope in a vise-like grip, trying to figure out how fast I could transistion from
paying the rope out to stopping a fall on our 9.5mm rope wound through my belay
device. I don't think I've ever been so nervous on a rope climb. It was with no
small measure of relief that I was happy to see Robert take weight on the rope
to
move across to the footholds just over the gap. I knew he would be
frustrated to some degree, but I didn't see how he was going to move across the
vertical,
holdless section without cratering. I find the 5.9 rating highly suspect - I
watched Robert cruise up the difficult 5.9 finger cracks on HCS the day before,
but this was a beast of another color. Robert surmised that the 5.9 rating might
be for taller climbers with longer reach, which seems likely. Though I aided
across it by grabbing the cord attached to the hanger, I was more easily able
to reach the higher holds just beyond it when it was my turn. Robert continued
traversing another 10-15ft to a small but
stable stance before
starting up on the improbable,
exposed face. This section is quite
steep but has decent holds.
Robert worked up in smooth style, eventually disappearing out of view.
Ten minutes later he'd set up a belay and brought me up
to join him. I thought
the exposed face climbing the most exhilarating of the route and was impressed
with Robert's cool lead up it.
At the top of P4 the route becomes class 3 and we both soloed the
remaining sections in about 15min, though Robert seemed to seek out
more
challenging variations. It was just after noon when we
reached the top with some rather incredible views overlooking the
Valley. Robert
celebrated by relieving his bladder off the north side
before we settled down for a 20min break at the summit. HCS rises much higher
to
the southwest, with
Higher and
Middle Cathedral
Rocks prominent to the west. Robert pointed out various routes on the features,
some of which he'd climbed, before we noted a pair of climbers much lower on
Middle Cathedral Rock making
their way up the Direct North Buttress, a
popular route on that feature. To
the east is a fine view of the
southside Valley features,
including Sentinel Rock and Lost Brother. Naturally, El Capitan dominates the
view to the north, but the Three Brothers are also shown in sharp profile.
I found our descent to be equally exciting, taking five rappels in all to get
back down to the start. The initial rap station is located at the top of the
South by Southwest Route, about 50yds southwest of the summit. There are 5-6
glued stainless rings installed in a flat area nearby that are much more obvious
and can be mistaken for the rap station, but they have no slings, no chains and
are not easy to rappel from (one party on Mountain Project warned of the
tremendous friction that needs to be overcome in pulling the rope). Robert
thought that they had been installed for rescue purposes, but it seems they
may in fact be for slacklining between the two spires. Robert found the correct
rap station at the top of the imposing Southwest Face and we started
down from there. Our 70m rope just worked for all the rappels - It wouldn't be
advisable to use a single 60m rope. The first rap
goes down to
a wide ledge before dropping to
a narrower one where a second
rap station is located. This is where the excitement happens as
the second rap ends at a hanging belay. With two of us strapped to a
pair of bolts overlooking a lot of air, we had to pull the rope, feeding it
through the next rap rings, then tie back into the rope one at a time to drop
another 35m
down the face. The
fourth and
fifth raps
were less exciting, with one dropping from a tree and the other from slings
around
a granite block, both descending through somewhat brushy class
4-5 terrain to reach the talus below.
It was 1:45p before we had finished the rappel, returned to the start to get
the gear we'd left there, and started down the talus/boulder gully.
Another 45min would be spent on the descent back down the gully and the return
to
Southside Drive and our cars. Though a couple of easy outings for
Robert, I'd
gotten my money's worth of rockclimbing these past two days and thanked Robert
greatly for his most invaluable assistance. I'd like to say it would incentize
me to start working on improving my climbing skills so that I could come back
some day to tackle HCS in proper style, but that's unlikely to happen. More
likely is that next time I will bring ascenders and jug my way up the darn
thing...
For more information see these SummitPost pages: Lower Cathedral Spire
This page last updated: Thu Nov 16 15:45:52 2017
For corrections or comments, please send feedback to: snwbord@hotmail.com